DFOW image Dog Federation
of Wisconsin

pix
Promoting and Protecting Responsible Dog Ownership Contact ::  Links ::  FAQ 
pix
   
pix
pix pix pix pix pix
pix
 
pix

· Home
· About DFOW
· Member Clubs
· News
· Legislation Issues
· Upcoming Activities
· Responsible Ownership
· Future Dog Owners
· Donate to DFOW
· Join Us!

pix
 
pix





In Association with Amazon.com
pix


The American Kennel Club and the Pet Animal Welfare Statute of 2005:
Whence Comes the Reversal of Course?

~ ~ ~

The Four Percent Solution

In attempting to make its case to the fancy, who the AKC Board cut out of the process prior to endorsing PAWS, the AKC through Dr. Holt has made the argument that:

. . . this definition covers fewer than 4 percent of all breeders who register litters with the AKC.28

The AKC has no way of determining fiom its registration statistics how many breeders who registered puppy litters also have bred cat litters. Cat litter registration statistics are not kept by the AKC. Since both the 25 sales exemption and the breeder exemption include the total cat and dog salesllitters of each person, AKC did not take into consideration dog and cat breeders when calculating the 4 percent figure.29

The AKC has no way of determining from its registration statistics how many breeders who register puppy litters of AKC-recognized breeds also have non AKC-recognized breeds registered with other registry organizations.30 The United Kennel Club (UKC) recognizes over 300 breeds with 250,000 registrations annually.31 It is suspected that AKC did not cross-check its database with that of UKC.

The 4 percent figure expounded by the AKC therefore is fatally flawed. It carries no credibility. It has no meaning.

Moreover the question remains: What was the threshold number of dog fanciers that AKC determined they would sacrifice by endorsing PAWS? Would AKC have supported PAWS if it affected 5 percent of breeders? Is the figure 10 percent? 15? 25?

Put another way, what is the number of hobby breeders and rescuers who AKC thinks is unworthy of its protection? At what point has AKC violated its mission to protect its "principal constituency?"

~ ~ ~

28 Ibid.
29 Which is not surprising, since AKC did not take into account cat fanciers at all before worshipping at the altar of PAWS.
30 AS Bill Fawcett has put it: "Are those irresponsible breeders worthy of over-regulation? Tell that to the Boykin Spaniel fancier! . . .Obviously, no breeders registered with FDSB, UKC, or other canine registries were considered."
31 United Kennel Club website.

 

 

<-- Back to 3. The 25 Sales Exemption - The Death of Rescue

 

 

 

 


pix
pix
 
pix


HAVE YOU CALLED TO VOICE YOUR OPPOSITION TO PAWS TODAY?

CALL:
202-224-2035
Senate Agricultural Committee

202-224-5270
Senate Appropriations Committee

202-225-2171
House Agricultural Committee

 


pix
pix
 
pix
Contact :: Links :: FAQ 
pix
Copyright 2004, Dog Federation of Wisconsin
pix