~
~ ~
Effect of
PAWS on Compliance with Local Zoning
Ordinances
One of the least-discussed
potential negative impacts upon hobby
breeders is the effect that adoption
of PAWS will have on state, county and
local legislative bodies in adoption
of breeder restrictions, and the effect
it will have on those administrative
agencies who enforce local zoning laws.
AKC's own position statement
about breeding restriction - taken from
their website July 24, 2005 - is as
follows:
The American Kennel
Club opposes the concept of breeding
permits, breeding bans or mandatory
spaylneuter of purebred dogs. Instead,
we support reasonable and enforceable
laws that protect the welfare and
health of purebred dogs and do not
restrict the rights of breeders and
owners who take their responsibilities
seriously.
This position cannot
be squared with the AKC's position on
PAWS. What is PAWS if it is not the
mother of all breeding restrictions?
Local and state legislators will immediately
pick up on this point to our detriment.
Certainly animal extremists have, as
a spokesperson for HSUS has called PAWS
"the first step."33
As state and local legislators,
many of whom are sympathetic to extremists,
introduce restrictions that may, in
fact, regulate breeders within their
jurisdiction, the AKC's position on
PAWS makes it nearly impossible to argue
in favor of a commercial/household retail
restriction, much less a retail/wholesale
distinction. What we can expect to be
left with is a patchwork quilt of breeding
restrictions throughout the country,
some of which are destined to be more
restrictive than PAWS. PAWS will likely
be viewed by the vanguard of the animal
extremist movement as the lynchpin in
their efforts to regulate hobby breeders
out of existence, as PAWS takes away
all effective arguments against local
control of breeding that we currently
have.
What is more, county
and local zoning agencies may view that
hobby breeders subject to USDA licensing
are contemporaneously deemed to be businesses
under local zoning regulations, which
may and probably do contain restrictions
on home-occupancy businesses, if not
outright bans. Thus, the effect of PAWS
may be a tsunami of new restrictions
and enforcement of existing zoning laws
unfavorable to hobby breeders throughout
the United States.
~ ~ ~
33 United Kennel Club website,
quoting unidentified HSUS spokesperson.
|