|
by
Cindy Goodman
One way a community can regulate
your enjoyment of dogs is through
zoning regulations. Zoning issues
are fairly recent - this century.
Zoning regulations are in derogation
of common law as the regulation
of property is an infringement
of an owner's right to its unlimited
use.
Zoning is a way for the government
to control and monitor growth
in the community and to eliminate
actions that may be offensive
to neighboring landowners. The
dog fancy may encounter a variety
of zoning issues including dog
limitations, set-backs of all
dog facilities, restriction of
business related endeavors.
If your community is considering
a zoning issue, how do you plan
your political strategies? First
you have to understand how zoning
works. Learn the terms. For example,
learn the difference between a
zoning map and a comprehensive
development plan (longer term
developmental goals). Obtain a
copy of all written materials
regarding zoning. Get a copy of
the current zoning and all proposals.
Check for updates and supplements.
Talk to the Land Use Planner.
Understand the nature of the zoning
review process. Does the Land
Use Planner have to make a recommendation
to the local planning commission?
Get promises in writing. For example,
if the Land Use Planner promises
that exception can be made upon
the establishment of certain buffers,
have those promises written into
the proposal. Recognize the dynamic
nature of zoning proposals. Begin
the political mobilization. Get
a large number of people to write.
Attend the hearing wearing uniform
shirts or buttons. Present your
arguments in sound land- use policy
terms. One county commission remarked
that "turning out a large
crowd gets us in the mood to help,
but voicing opposition in sound
land-use terms sure gives us an
excuse to do the right thing."
The power of a community to zone
is found in the state constitution.
Review this document carefully
to see the extent of powers granted
to the local community. Also look
in your state code for any limitations
in the way that zoning provisions
are enacted. The state law may
specify how the zoning issue is
considered (i.e. notice in the
community newspaper, specific
days advance notice), what criteria
must be considered, and how the
zoning resolution is written and
recorded. If the community does
not follow these guidelines, any
enacted zoning ordinances may
be invalid.
If an adverse zoning ordinance
passes before you have had time
to gather the troops, research
whether you can invalidate the
ordinance for failure to follow
the required procedures or ordinance
content standards. Verify that
the notice was appropriately made
in the correct newspaper and for
the required time period. Check
to see whether the community correctly
incorporated the changes into
the zoning code. The actual maps
must be attached and referenced.
The maps and documents must be
sufficiently identified with no
uncertainty, must be made a part
of the public record, must be
accessible to the members of the
public who are or may be affected
by it, and the adopting ordinance
must generally give notice of
this accessibility. Oral testimony
of the contents and location are
generally insufficient to support
the zoning ordinance. Many jurisdictions
also require that written criteria
for the decision be part of the
ordinance. Therefore, failure
to specify adequate standards
by which the land use decision
are made could invalidate the
zoning ordinance.
In enacting zoning criteria,
the government balances the perceived
benefit to the health, safety
and welfare of the general public
with the harm suffered by the
landowner. Harm is generally measured
by whether the property has value
and use as zoned. This can be
a difficult obstacle to surmount
because your residence still has
value as a residence.
Some criteria that have been
used in the past are:
Will the zoning proposal permit
a use that is suitable in view
of the use and development of
adjacent and nearby property?
To answer this question you have
to be familiar with the uses of
neighboring property.
Will the zoning proposal adversely
affect the existing use or usability
of adjacent or nearby property?
What is the relative gain to the
public as compared to the hardship
imposed upon the individual property
owner?
Will property affected by the
zoning proposal have a reasonable
economic use as currently zoned?
What is the suitability of the
property for the zoned purposes?
Will or could the zoning proposal
cause excessive or burdensome
use of existing streets, transportation
facilities, utilities, or schools?
Will the zoning proposal be in
conformity with the policy and
intent of any land use plans?
Will the existing or changing
conditions affecting the use and
development of property give supporting
grounds for approval/disapproval
of the zoning proposal?
These criteria may require the
use of expert testimony. Utilize
land use planners, sanitation
experts, real estate appraisers,
real estate agents and any other
appropriate expert. Locate experts
who are credible and have the
ability to clearly explain their
findings. Use your presentation
time wisely. You may only have
ten minutes per side. The speakers
should be forceful, organized
and concise. Avoid redundant testimony.
Prepare the opposition case as
well as your arguments. By thinking
out the opposing viewpoints, you
can better prepare your case.
Use visuals - maps, charts and
graphs. If you use photos or text,
enlarge them and mount them on
a board.
There still may be hope after
an oppressive zoning regulation
is passed. You may be able to
obtain a variance or a special
land use permit on a specific
piece of property. To change an
individual classification, you
will have to file an application,
gain the support (or at least
the withdrawal of opposition)
from neighbors, work with planning
and zoning staff, and prepare
supporting documents and expert
testimony.
You may also be able to appeal.
If you think that this matter
will have to be won on appeal,
be sure to consult with a local
attorney in order to set the groundwork.
For example, you may have to order
a transcript and raise constitutional
issues before the local governing
body in order to process the appeal.
|